Oregon Supreme Court

2025

January 1 summary

Huseky v. Department of Corrections

Under ORCP 21, a plaintiff need not plead an enforceable right to future employment to allege economic damages.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Civil Procedure

February 0 summaries

March 1 summary

Gilbert / March v. Dept. of Energy

Under OAR 345-0371(9), EFSC is required to grant contested case proceedings only when it raises a significant issue of fact or law that is reasonably likely to affect the amendment.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Administrative Law

April 1 summary

State v. Cotter

Under State v. Meyrick and State v. Langley, a waiver of counsel must be knowing and intentional, with the preferred means being colloquy on the record, and courts may not presume waiver from a silent record.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Criminal Procedure

May 2 summaries

State v. Perez

“[A] plain-error challenge based on the prosecution’s purportedly improper arguments to the jury [requires] that the defendant establish that it is obvious and beyond reasonable dispute that the prosecutor’s statements were improper, whether because they misstated the law, adversely commented on the defendant’s exercise of a constitutional right, referenced matters not in evidence, or otherwise could only be understood to have urged the jury to draw an impermissible inference.”

Area(s) of Law:
  • Criminal Law

KKMH Properties, LLC v. Shire

Under ORS 90.392(3)(c) must state that a violation can be cured when, as a matter of law, a tenant has a right to cure the violation.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Landlord Tenant

June 0 summaries

July 0 summaries

August 0 summaries

September 0 summaries

October 0 summaries

November 0 summaries

December 0 summaries


Back to Top