Oregon Supreme Court

2025

January 1 summary

Huseky v. Department of Corrections

Under ORCP 21, a plaintiff need not plead an enforceable right to future employment to allege economic damages.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Civil Procedure

February 0 summaries

March 1 summary

Gilbert / March v. Dept. of Energy

Under OAR 345-0371(9), EFSC is required to grant contested case proceedings only when it raises a significant issue of fact or law that is reasonably likely to affect the amendment.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Administrative Law

April 1 summary

State v. Cotter

Under State v. Meyrick and State v. Langley, a waiver of counsel must be knowing and intentional, with the preferred means being colloquy on the record, and courts may not presume waiver from a silent record.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Criminal Procedure

May 2 summaries

State v. Perez

“[A] plain-error challenge based on the prosecution’s purportedly improper arguments to the jury [requires] that the defendant establish that it is obvious and beyond reasonable dispute that the prosecutor’s statements were improper, whether because they misstated the law, adversely commented on the defendant’s exercise of a constitutional right, referenced matters not in evidence, or otherwise could only be understood to have urged the jury to draw an impermissible inference.”

Area(s) of Law:
  • Criminal Law

KKMH Properties, LLC v. Shire

Under ORS 90.392(3)(c) must state that a violation can be cured when, as a matter of law, a tenant has a right to cure the violation.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Landlord Tenant

June 2 summaries

State v. Walsh

A provision in a plea agreement that the court “may impose” consecutive sentences is ambiguous and can mean that the court has the authority to impose consecutive sentences with or without certain statutory findings.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Post-Conviction Relief

State v. Burton

Absence of evidence may be argued to show reasonable doubt, but evidence that is not in the record with the potential to mislead the jury may not be.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Evidence

July 2 summaries

Delta Airlines, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

A legislative tax classification is constitutional if it is rationally related to a legitimate legislative purpose

Area(s) of Law:
  • Tax Law

State v. Logston

Where there is no other limiting authority, a court is permitted under the Oregon Constitution to impose consecutive sentences when the crimes involve different victims, even across separate cases and after a probation revocation.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Post-Conviction Relief

August 0 summaries

September 0 summaries

October 0 summaries

November 0 summaries

December 0 summaries


Back to Top