State v. Franzen

Summarized by:

  • Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
  • Area(s) of Law: Criminal Procedure
  • Date Filed: 02-05-2025
  • Case #: A179028
  • Judge(s)/Court Below: Aoyagi, P.J.; Joyce, J.; Kistler, S.J.
  • Full Text Opinion

Speculation that missing evidence may be more helpful is insufficient to require a less satisfactory evidence instruction to the jury.

Defendant petitioned for reconsideration from a prior decision. Defendant previously argued that the cell phone video was less satisfactory than the original video. Speculation that missing evidence may be more helpful is insufficient to require a less satisfactory evidence instruction to the jury. The Court explained that there is no evidence that a wider view from the original video would have revealed any more witnesses. Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Advanced Search


Back to Top