State v. G. A. K.

Summarized by:

  • Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
  • Area(s) of Law: Civil Commitment
  • Date Filed: 04-29-2015
  • Case #: A156216
  • Judge(s)/Court Below: Per Curium; Presiding Judge Armstrong; Judges Nakamoto and Egan.

Evidence was insufficient to support involuntary commitment where the State failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that appellant was unable to provide for her basic needs due to a mental disorder.

After a judgment committing Appellant G. A. K. for a period not to exceed 180 days, appellant argued the State failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence she was unable to provide for her basic needs due to a mental disorder. The State conceded, and the Court accepted the State's concession. Reversed.

Advanced Search


Back to Top