January 10 summaries
February 5 summaries
March 7 summaries
April 8 summaries
May 0 summaries
June 0 summaries
July 0 summaries
August 0 summaries
September 0 summaries
October 4 summaries
Central Oregon Landwatch v. Jefferson County
Under OAR 660-015-0000(14) and OAR 660-024-0040(1), changes of Urban Growth Boundaries require showing a 20-year need and a need for “housing, employment opportunities or uses such as public facilities, streets and roads, schools, parks or open space.”
Area(s) of Law:- Land Use
Schaefer v. Marion County
OAR 660-012-0065(3)(n) specifically provides that “expansions or alterations of public use airports* * * meet planning goals 3, 4, 11, and 14 as a matter of law.
Area(s) of Law:- Land Use
Oregon Coast Alliance et al v. City of Florence
Under ORS 197.830(9) and OAR 661-010-0015(l)(a), notices of intent to appeal land use decisions must be filed within 21 days after the decision becomes final, or in the case of post-acknowledgment plan amendments (PAPA), 21 days after notice of the decision is mailed, unless a different local rule applies.
Area(s) of Law:- Land Use
Laurel Hill Valley Citizens v. City of Eugene
“[T]he exact nature and extent of the role played by any [refinement plan] policy depends, presumably, on the actual text and context of the particular policy.” Bothman v. City of Eugene, 51 Or LUBA 426, 439 (2006).
Area(s) of Law:- Land Use