Thorin Properties v. City of Eugene
“In order to have standing, to seek a declaration with respect to an ordinance, a plaintiff must show that it had a legally recognized interest that is adversely affected by that ordinance.” MT & M Gaming, Inc. v. City of Portland, 360 Or 544 (2016). A state law can preempt a municipal law by implication if the two “cannot operate concurrently.” Qwest Corp. v. City of Portland, 275 Ore. App. 874 (2015)
Area(s) of Law:- Property Law
Block v. DEA Properties–2 LLC
“The dispositive question at issue in an implied easement case is whether a reasonable buyer would have been justified in expecting the easement under the circumstances that existed at the time of purchase.”
Area(s) of Law:- Property Law