Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. Entertainment Theatre Group

Summarized by:

  • Court: Intellectual Property Archives
  • Area(s) of Law: Copyright
  • Date Filed: 10-30-2014
  • Case #: 13–5570
  • Judge(s)/Court Below: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
  • LexisNexis Citation: 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153940
  • Westlaw Citation: 2014 WL 5483487
  • Full Text Opinion

A prior decision barring a claim to copyright ownership precludes a defendant in a later case from making a claim of ownership as an affirmative defense.

Opinion(SCHMEHL): Plaintiff Disney Enterprises, Inc. (Disney), sued defendant Entertainment Theatre Group (ETG) for using copyrighted material in a stage show that included characters, songs, and images associated with Spider-Man. In response, ETG was given a retroactive license to use the Spider-Man copyright by Stan Lee Media, Inc. (SLMI). SLMI has been involved in several lawsuits regarding it's claims to the Spider-Man copyright. Of particular note, a 2010 opinion dismissed SLMI's claim to Spider-Man because the copyright claim was time-barred by the statute of limitations. In the present case, SLMI attempted to intervene as a third party and assert SLMI's copyright claims as an affirmative defense. The court found such a maneuver "would most definitely go beyond a defensive assertion and provide SLMI with the affirmative relief it has been seeking unsuccessfully all these years." The defense would effectively allow SLMI to use the Spider-Man property, knowing that it is immune from infringement claims. As such, the Court held that the prior decisions holding that SLMI does not own Spider-Man preclude SLMI from using such claims as an affirmative defense. The Disney's motion is GRANTED, DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE ETG's amended counterclaims and SLMI's intervener complaint.

Advanced Search


Back to Top