DLCD v. Clackamas County
“When the language in the [Draft] is compared to the language that LCDC ultimately adopted, and what is at issue in this appeal, it is clear that all Upzoning requires an exception to Goal 14 and that petitioner's construction of the rule is the correct one because It comports with LCDC's Intent…”
Area(s) of Law:- Land Use
North Hideaway Hills Neighbors v. Lane County
According to ORS 215.448, a home occupation must be operated substantially in the dwelling or in buildings typically associated with uses allowed in the zone. This implies that the primary business activities should occur on-site in a way that aligns with the character of other local permissible uses.
Area(s) of Law:- Land Use